Sye – endgame
Well Sye said he has an argument for his premise (1). We have asked him countless times what it is. He...
Well Sye said he has an argument for his premise (1). We have asked him countless times what it is. He...
By the way Sye, as you clearly think you have “won” this debate – and with a professional...
Hi Sye You said: Nope, that is not the argument. Again, it is like this: 1. God is the necessary...
SYE RESPONDS TO MY PRECEEDING POST: @ Stephen, Alright, how about we go this way. Since you, and perhaps...
Hi Sye So we are back here again. OK, let’s go round again. Only this time even more slowly and...
Incidentally, Sye’s definition of “proof” as valid argument with true premises also makes...
Sye, you have repeatedly made a certain sort of move. Here’s an example. I say, “Sye, not only...
Here’s a small but I think very telling observation worth making at this point. Sye has just defined a...
What’s wrong with this argument, Sye? Which premise do you reject? Or is the logic faulty? 1. God...
Addressing the question: (1) How is it even possible for there to be objective laws of logic in the absence...
Well, we are getting somewhere. For example, Sye has given up using these strategies: (i) insisting that all...
Hi Sye So here’s your last response to me (the references are to this page of Sye’s...
Hi Sye Thanks for the answers. Very helpful. This post deals with your response to my post Sye’s...
Sye is still pressing the question (paraphrasing): “But how do you atheists account for the laws of logic?...
Hello Sye – you do need to respond, surely, to the two points I made in Sye’s argument and...
Recent Comments