wittgenstein | Believing Bullshit

Pages Menu

Home » wittgenstein

Posted by Stephen Law on Mar 10, 2011 in wittgenstein | 0 comments

Private Language Argument paper

My paper on Crispin Wright’s take on Wittgenstein’s private language argument is online here is anyone is interested. Wright’s version is not...

Posted by Stephen Law on Feb 11, 2010 in religion, wittgenstein | 0 comments

“In Wittgenstein, I discovered a voice that advised me not to be endlessly detained these questions”

Giles Fraser has been explaining over at the Guardian why Wittgenstein appeals so strongly to some religious types (like Sam Norton, I suppose – what do you think...

Posted by Stephen Law on Jan 10, 2008 in wittgenstein | 17 comments

Wittgenstein Summer School at Oxford University

I am running a week on Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations for Oxford University Depart. of Continuing Education. 12th-19th July. Details available here....

Posted by Stephen Law on Oct 16, 2007 in reviews, wittgenstein | 3 comments

Review – The Philosopher’s Dog, by Rai Gaita

Saturday March 1, 2003The Guardian The Philosopher’s Dogby Raimond Gaita224pp, Routledge, £14.99 What are minds, exactly? Most of us, when first confronted with...

Posted by Stephen Law on Sep 12, 2007 in five private language arguments, wittgenstein | 2 comments

Five Private Language Arguments (International Journal of Philosophical Studies 12, no. 2 (2004))

My paper Five Private Language Arguments is available here. Comments welcome. It provides a fairly clear explanation of five different private language arguments that...

Private Language Argument paper

“In Wittgenstein, I discovered a voice that advised me not to be endlessly detained these questions”

Wittgenstein Summer School at Oxford University

Review – The Philosopher’s Dog, by Rai Gaita

Five Private Language Arguments (International Journal of Philosophical Studies 12, no. 2 (2004))

About Me

Sye’s Presuppositional Apologetics

“Proof that God Exists”

Sye is back – and telling fibs?

Sye – nowhere to run to, baby.

Erik Wielenberg’s argument defended and developed – forthcoming in Religious Studies

Playing the Mystery Card (includes McGrath vs Dawkins) from my Believing Bullshit

Philosophy and Religion in Schools

Interviewed in Tehran

LITTLE ATOMS Radio Show

“To deny that [Jesus] was a solid historical figure is to my mind a certain indication that standards of rationality have been left behind.”

Fumbling Feser

Snow

Recent Comments

Archives

Categories