Hi Sye You said: Nope, that is not the argument. Again, it is like this: 1. God is the necessary precondition for logic (by the impossiblity of the contrary).2. Logic...
Read MoreSYE RESPONDS TO MY PRECEEDING POST: @ Stephen, Alright, how about we go this way. Since you, and perhaps many of your cohorts are philosphically trained, why...
Read MoreHi Sye So we are back here again. OK, let’s go round again. Only this time even more slowly and carefully. On your website, you present this argument: (1) The...
Read MoreIncidentally, Sye’s definition of “proof” as valid argument with true premises also makes sense of something else. He argues: 1. The existence of...
Read MoreSye, you have repeatedly made a certain sort of move. Here’s an example. I say, “Sye, not only have you not got a good argument for logic being underpinned...
Read MoreHere’s a small but I think very telling observation worth making at this point. Sye has just defined a “proof” as a valid argument with true premises....
Read More
Recent Comments