Another presuppositionalist
Just discovered this talk, with accompanying slides, which pushes the same atheism-bashing argument – atheists cannot allow for or justify logic and reason. The...
Read MoreJust discovered this talk, with accompanying slides, which pushes the same atheism-bashing argument – atheists cannot allow for or justify logic and reason. The...
Read More“…for all its a priori reasonableness, a boundary between the analytic and synthetic statements simply has not been drawn. That there is such a distinction to be...
Read MoreAs we are still talking about whether atheists can “account” for (i.e. justify, allow for, and explain) the laws of logic, here’s a third possibility...
Read MoreI have to go off for maybe a week. Will be back. Carry on with out me. In the meantime, I produce a sketch of my own presuppositionalism I have been developing. It goes...
Read MoreOne thought that may be bothering Sye (though who can tell?) is: what makes the laws of logic hold? What explains and accounts for their necessity? What prevents it...
Read MoreIt’s been suggested (by me and others) that: SUGGESTION: the laws of logic may just be necessary – their necessity may just be a brute fact for which no...
Read More
Recent Comments