The War For Children’s Minds

I was billed as the author of The War For Children’s Minds on BBC1 Big Questions – this coming Sunday (see previous post). Hope a few more people will now read it…

‘…this volume has a hugely significant contribution to make. It is also highly readable, and provides a useful pocket guide to current philosophical thinking – a sort of religious Bill Bryson.’ – Church Times

‘The War for Children’s Minds is a brilliantly clear and convincingly argued defence of liberalism in moral education. Stephen Law examines and demolishes all the arguments in favour of authoritarian ways of teaching, and shows that in spite of the insistence of popular commentators from the religious right, a liberal and rational examination and discussion of moral questions does not lead to relativism and the decay of ethical behaviour, but can in fact be the best defence against them. This book won’t be read by popular journalists: they will attack it without reading it. But it should be read by every teacher, every parent, and every politician. What’s more, it should form the subject for discussion in every church, synagogue, mosque, and religious youth group. It’s one of the most engaging as well as one of the most necessary books that I’ve ever read in the field of moral education.’  – Philip Pullman 

‘Progressives schools, they say, promote the wishy-washy, anything goes mentality that is the source of our social malaise. In The War for Children’s Minds, Stephen Law does a splendid and philosophically thrilling job of cutting that argument to shreds.’ – The Guardian

‘…a succinct and eloquent defence of liberalism.’ – The Economist

‘A stirring defence of liberal values.’ – Times Educational Supplement

‘A passionate philosophical defence of a liberal approach to parenting and education.’ – The Guardian

‘This defence of reason should be obligatory reading, not just in schools, but in parliament and the press. ‘ – Sunday Herald

‘[The] debate about children’s education…seems to be dominated by the other side. It’s a side that believes Liberal is a dirty word, that the Enlightenment did more harm than good and that children should be taught in a much more formal way. In his book [Law] begs to differ. He suggests that children should be allowed to examine and discuss religious and moral issues in a liberal, philosophically informed and rational way.’ – The Oxford Times