Here are all the posts that I have written on Richard Carrier’s book On The Historicity of Jesus:
Seed of David, Take Two – **OF INTEREST** Includes Original Observations and Comments about Romans 1:3 – “The Seed of David” passage; And why it is completely compatible with the Christ Myth theory.
Carrier has written responses to Part 1, Part 2, Part 2a, Part 3, Parts 4 & 5,and Parts 6 through 11.and a response to Seed of David, Take Two. Since Carrier and I pretty much agree on Part 1, I’ll only be responding to Part 2. I’ll have to think over the considerations Carrier brought up in his response to Part 2a, but overall my current thought is that the ‘James brother of the Lord’ reference counts as evidence for a historical Jesus, albeit even more modest than I thought even in my initial analysis, and I may change my mind on this in the future.
I will try to make a point to keep this updated, but if notice something missing that should be included please let me know in the comments.
*If you read the post with an asterisk by it, be sure and read Part 9, as I have somewhat revised the conclusions I came to in these posts.