{"id":2279,"date":"2013-04-25T09:57:08","date_gmt":"2013-04-25T09:57:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/tippling\/?p=2279"},"modified":"2013-04-25T09:57:08","modified_gmt":"2013-04-25T09:57:08","slug":"new-battery-design-could-help-solar-and-wind-power-the-grid","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/tippling\/2013\/04\/25\/new-battery-design-could-help-solar-and-wind-power-the-grid\/","title":{"rendered":"New Battery Design Could Help Solar and Wind Power the Grid"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify\">I love renewable energy. It fascinates and excites me in all my geekness. But \u00a0it needs to be competitive. Is the tide turning (get it?)? <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/releases\/2013\/04\/130424140603.htm\">Science Daily<\/a>:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Apr. 24, 2013\u00a0\u2014 Researchers from the U.S. Department of Energy&#8217;s (DOE) SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory and Stanford University have designed a low-cost, long-life battery that could enable solar and wind energy to become major suppliers to the electrical grid.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">&#8220;For solar and wind power to be used in a significant way, we need a battery made of economical materials that are easy to scale and still efficient,&#8221; said Yi Cui, a Stanford associate professor of materials science and engineering and a member of the Stanford Institute for Materials and Energy Sciences, a SLAC\/Stanford joint institute. &#8220;We believe our new battery may be the best yet designed to regulate the natural fluctuations of these alternative energies.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Cui and colleagues report their research results, some of the earliest supported by the DOE&#8217;s new Joint Center for Energy Storage Research battery hub, in the May issue of<em>Energy &amp; Environmental Science.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Currently the electrical grid cannot tolerate large and sudden power fluctuations caused by wide swings in sunlight and wind. As solar and wind&#8217;s combined contributions to an electrical grid approach 20 percent, energy storage systems must be available to smooth out the peaks and valleys of this &#8220;intermittent&#8221; power &#8212; storing excess energy and discharging when input drops.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Among the most promising batteries for intermittent grid storage today are &#8220;flow&#8221; batteries, because it&#8217;s relatively simple to scale their tanks, pumps and pipes to the sizes needed to handle large capacities of energy. The new flow battery developed by Cui&#8217;s group has a simplified, less expensive design that presents a potentially viable solution for large-scale production.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Today&#8217;s flow batteries pump two different liquids through an interaction chamber where dissolved molecules undergo chemical reactions that store or give up energy. The chamber contains a membrane that only allows ions not involved in reactions to pass between the liquids while keeping the active ions physically separated. This battery design has two major drawbacks: the high cost of liquids containing rare materials such as vanadium &#8212; especially in the huge quantities needed for grid storage &#8212; and the membrane, which is also very expensive and requires frequent maintenance.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">The new Stanford\/SLAC battery design uses only one stream of molecules and does not need a membrane at all. Its molecules mostly consist of the relatively inexpensive elements lithium and sulfur, which interact with a piece of lithium metal coated with a barrier that permits electrons to pass without degrading the metal. When discharging, the molecules, called lithium polysulfides, absorb lithium ions; when charging, they lose them back into the liquid. The entire molecular stream is dissolved in an organic solvent, which doesn&#8217;t have the corrosion issues of water-based flow batteries.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">&#8220;In initial lab tests, the new battery also retained excellent energy-storage performance through more than 2,000 charges and discharges, equivalent to more than 5.5 years of daily cycles,&#8221; Cui said.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">To demonstrate their concept, the researchers created a miniature system using simple glassware. Adding a lithium polysulfide solution to the flask immediately produces electricity that lights an LED.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">A utility version of the new battery would be scaled up to store many megawatt-hours of energy.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">In the future, Cui&#8217;s group plans to make a laboratory-scale system to optimize its energy storage process and identify potential engineering issues, and to start discussions with potential hosts for a full-scale field-demonstration unit.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I love renewable energy. It fascinates and excites me in all my geekness. But  it needs to be competitive. Is the tide turning (get it?)? Science Daily: <\/p>\n<p>Apr. 24, 2013 \u2014 Researchers from the U.S. Department of Energy&#8217;s (DOE) SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory and Stanford University have designed a low-cost, long-life battery that could enable solar and wind energy to become major suppliers to the electrical grid.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[398,20],"tags":[154,53,605,603,604],"class_list":["post-2279","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-environment-2","category-science","tag-climate-change-2","tag-environment","tag-renewable-energy","tag-solar","tag-wind-energy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/tippling\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2279","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/tippling\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/tippling\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/tippling\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/tippling\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2279"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/tippling\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2279\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/tippling\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2279"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/tippling\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2279"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/tippling\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2279"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}