{"id":1151,"date":"2012-11-26T19:15:28","date_gmt":"2012-11-26T19:15:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/tippling\/?p=1151"},"modified":"2012-11-26T19:58:53","modified_gmt":"2012-11-26T19:58:53","slug":"a-year-in-jail-for-not-believing-in-god-how-kentucky-is-persecuting-atheist","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/tippling\/2012\/11\/26\/a-year-in-jail-for-not-believing-in-god-how-kentucky-is-persecuting-atheist\/","title":{"rendered":"A Year in Jail for Not Believing in God? How Kentucky is Persecuting Atheist"},"content":{"rendered":"
Here<\/a> is yet another example of intolerant stupidity:<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\n
\"\"
Kentucky State Rep. Tom Riner authored legislation inserting god into the homeland security department. (photo: Fox News)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
AlterNet<\/a>\u00a0\/\u00a0By<\/em>\u00a0Laura Gottesdiener<\/a><\/em><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n

In Kentucky, a homeland security law requires the state\u2019s citizens to acknowledge the security provided by the Almighty God–or risk 12 months in prison.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n

\n

The law and its sponsor, state representative Tom Riner, have been the subject of controversy since the law first surfaced in 2006, yet the Kentucky state Supreme Court has refused to review its constitutionality, despite clearly violating the First Amendment\u2019s separation of church and state.<\/p>\n

“This is one of the most egregiously and breathtakingly unconstitutional actions by a state legislature that I’ve ever seen,” said Edwin Kagin, the legal director of American Atheists’, a national organization focused defending the civil rights of atheists. American Atheists\u2019 launched a lawsuit against the law in 2008, which won at the Circuit Court level, but was then overturned by the state Court of Appeals.<\/p>\n

The law states, “The safety and security of the Commonwealth cannot be achieved apart from reliance upon Almighty God as set forth in the public speeches and proclamations of American Presidents, including Abraham Lincoln’s historic March 30, 1863, presidential proclamation urging Americans to pray and fast during one of the most dangerous hours in American history, and the text of President John F. Kennedy’s November 22, 1963, national security speech which concluded: “For as was written long ago: ‘Except the Lord keep the city, the watchman waketh but in vain.'”<\/p>\n

The law requires that plaques celebrating the power of the Almighty God be installed outside the state Homeland Security building–and carries a criminal penalty of up to 12 months in jail if one fails to comply. The plaque\u2019s inscription begins with the assertion, \u201cThe safety and security of the Commonwealth cannot be achieved apart from reliance upon Almighty God.\u201d<\/p>\n

Tom Riner, a Baptist minister and the long-time Democratic state representative, sponsored the law.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe church-state divide is not a line I see,\u201d Riner told\u00a0The New York Times<\/a>\u00a0<\/em>shortly after the law was first challenged in court. \u201cWhat I do see is an attempt to separate America from its history of perceiving itself as a nation under God.\u201d<\/p>\n

A practicing Baptist minister, Riner is solely devoted to his faith–even when that directly conflicts with his job as state representative. He has often been at the center of unconstitutional and expensive controversies throughout his 26 years in office. In the last ten years, for example, the state has spent more than $160,000 in string of losing court cases against the American Civil Liberties Union over the state\u2019s decision to display the Ten Commandments in public buildings, legislation that Riner sponsored.<\/p>\n

Although the Kentucky courts have yet to strike down the law, some judges have been explicit about its unconstitutionality.<\/p>\n

“Kentucky’s law is a legislative finding, avowed as factual, that the Commonwealth is not safe absent reliance on Almighty God. Further, (the law) places a duty upon the executive director to publicize the assertion while stressing to the public that dependence upon Almighty God is vital, or necessary, in assuring the safety of the commonwealth,\u201d wrote Judge Ann O’Malley Shake in Court of Appeals\u2019 dissenting opinion.<\/p>\n

This rational was in the minority, however, as the Court of Appeals reversed the lower courts\u2019 decision that the law was unconstitutional.<\/p>\n

Last week, American Atheists submitted a petition to the U.S. Supreme Court to review the law.<\/p>\n

Riner, meanwhile, continues to abuse the state representative\u2019s office, turning it into a pulpit for his God-fearing message.<\/p>\n

“The safety and security of the state cannot be achieved apart from recognizing our dependence upon God,” Riner recently told Fox News.<\/a><\/p>\n

“We believe dependence on God is essential. … What the founding fathers stated and what every president has stated, is their reliance and recognition of Almighty God, that’s what we’re doing,” he said.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In Kentucky, a homeland security law requires the state\u2019s citizens to acknowledge the security provided by the Almighty God–or risk 12 months in prison. <\/p>\n

The law and its sponsor, state representative Tom Riner, have been the subject of controversy since the law first surfaced in 2006, yet the Kentucky state Supreme Court has refused to review its constitutionality, despite clearly violating the First Amendment\u2019s separation of church and state.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[256,17],"tags":[275,276,157],"class_list":["post-1151","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-atheism-2","category-politics","tag-arheism","tag-intolerance","tag-us-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/tippling\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1151","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/tippling\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/tippling\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/tippling\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/tippling\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1151"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/tippling\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1151\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/tippling\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1151"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/tippling\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1151"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/tippling\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1151"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}