In the same way that evolution improves organisms’ fitness for survival in their environment through performance, feedback and revision, at ATP we would like some feedback to make any necessary revisions. So far our performance here seems to have done just fine with a growing readership and some lively commenting. However, it is hard to know from the inside, sometimes, whether one is hitting the mark or not.
Myself and my contributors have tried to provide a variety of posts and articles, from arguments to news articles, philosophy through science to theology. And my first interview!
How can we improve? What do you like about ATP? What do you dislike? All and every piece of constructive feedback welcomed.
One of my aims is to try to attract religious commentators in order to get lively debate going, which is something I would like to encourage.
