{"id":447,"date":"2012-10-30T11:57:02","date_gmt":"2012-10-30T11:57:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/reasonablyfaithless\/?p=447"},"modified":"2012-10-30T11:57:02","modified_gmt":"2012-10-30T11:57:02","slug":"unicorns","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/reasonablyfaithless\/2012\/10\/30\/unicorns\/","title":{"rendered":"Unicorns"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>When a hard question is asked in a public forum like Facebook, most Christians will refuse to answer. \u00a0They often make excuses like &#8220;this is too complex an issue to discuss on Facebook&#8221;, or &#8220;we should talk about this in person some time&#8221;, or even &#8220;you wouldn&#8217;t accept the answer because you&#8217;re too closed-minded&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>But if there really <em>are<\/em> answers to the difficult questions, why would you keep them to yourself? \u00a0Why keep them from me? \u00a0And why keep them from the other curious folk who are watching from the sidelines? \u00a0If you do know the answer, but don&#8217;t share it, wouldn&#8217;t this just make it look like there <em>aren&#8217;t<\/em> answers after all? \u00a0Is this the impression you&#8217;d want to give?<\/p>\n<p>The truth is, if there <em>were<\/em> satisfactory answers, Christians would give them. \u00a0How do I know this? \u00a0Simple. \u00a0Whenever you ask a question for which there <em>is<\/em> a satisfactory answer, Christians will run from everywhere to provide you with one. \u00a0Post a link to an article about a gay apostle Paul, or a married Jesus, and they will start refuting them left, right and centre, quoting 1st and 2nd century sources to back their arguments up.<\/p>\n<p>But my all time favourite religious discussion on Facebook involved unicorns. \u00a0Simply point out that the King James Bible has numerous references to these mythological beasts, and Christians who remain silent during discussions of biblical contradictions or the problem of evil will come out of the woodwork with some helpful information to help set you straight. \u00a0Here is the verse I playfully posted as my status some time last year:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;And the unicorns shall come down with them, and the bullocks with the bulls; and their land shall be soaked with blood, and their dust made fat with fatness.&#8221; \u00a0(Isaiah 34:7)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Several of my Christian friends responded, with a minister and a few theological students and graduates among them. \u00a0They pulled out the big guns:\u00a0the Hebrew and Aramaic Lexicon of the Old Testament, Wikipedia, Answers In Genesis (apparently humans <a href=\"http:\/\/www.answersingenesis.org\/articles\/aid\/v2\/n1\/unicorns-in-bible\"><em>did<\/em><\/a> live alongside unicorns). \u00a0Different translations were examined: the KJV, the NIV, the Good News version, even the Greek Septuagint (LXX). \u00a0Possible interpretations of the troublesome word\u00a0<em>Re&#8217;em<\/em>\u00a0(Hebrew \u05e8\u05b6\u05d0\u05b5\u05dd<em><\/em>, which apparently occurs just 9 times in the Old Testament, and\u00a0has few if any parallels in other ancient semitic languages)\u00a0were considered:\u00a0wild ox or bull, rhinoceros, oryx, white antelope, ram, unicorn (which just means <em>single horn<\/em>, by the way, not necessarily a mythical creature), but most likely the\u00a0<em>aurochs,<\/em> a well known large and now extinct type of ox. \u00a0According to the\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Unicorn\">Wikipedia article<\/a>,\u00a0Ctesias (early 4th century BCE) was the first Greek to describe unicorns, saying they were found in India; it seems Strabo and Pliny the elder also thought they existed.<\/p>\n<p>Eventually, the conversation rambled into obscurity, with a few ubiquitous Monty Python references, and an adaptation of the Ontological Argument for the existence of Charlie, the Maximally Great Unicorn, before the situation was summed up nicely by a wise friend:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Haha, oh man, how do I only see these things when they\u2019ve already petered out towards apologies &amp; declarations of irony? \u00a0The image of people scrambling to their bibles &amp; wikipedia \u2013 the 2 most reliable sources known to man \u2013 to explain away unicorns was priceless! \u00a0A great example of how some people will believe anything, or perhaps that once someone has commited to believing something nothing can interfere with that belief. \u00a0Smiley face, apology, ironic hugs &amp; kisses!<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>To conclude, I should be fair and say that some of my Christian friends have been very generous with their time, and have been willing to discuss some of the hard questions, and we have all learnt and grown through these conversations, even if the &#8220;answers&#8221; do not satisfy. \u00a0I appreciate these people a lot.<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Charlie the Unicorn\" width=\"500\" height=\"281\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/CsGYh8AacgY?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp; When a hard question is asked in a public forum like Facebook, most Christians will refuse to answer. \u00a0They&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":16,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[29,6,57,13],"tags":[211,191,219,197,32,204,212,58],"class_list":["post-447","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bible","category-christianity","category-facebook","category-humour","tag-bible","tag-christianity","tag-facebook","tag-god","tag-maximally-great-being","tag-ontological-argument","tag-religion","tag-unicorns"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/reasonablyfaithless\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/447","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/reasonablyfaithless\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/reasonablyfaithless\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/reasonablyfaithless\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/16"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/reasonablyfaithless\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=447"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/reasonablyfaithless\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/447\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/reasonablyfaithless\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=447"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/reasonablyfaithless\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=447"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/reasonablyfaithless\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=447"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}