So, I’m not going to talk about that. \u00a0Instead, I’m going to focus on this new thing – feminists actively enabling rape and sexual assault.<\/p>\n
Let me remind people of the definition of\u00a0enable<\/em>:<\/p>\n 1.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n to<\/span> make<\/span> able<\/a>; give<\/span> power,<\/span> means,<\/span> competence,<\/span>or<\/span> ability<\/span> to;<\/span> authorize:<\/span><\/p>\n 2.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n to<\/span> make<\/span> possible<\/span> or<\/span> easy:<\/span><\/p>\n 3.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n There’s Gaby Hinsniff with the promising title that “After Cologne, Feminism is Dead<\/a>“, but in it she just whinges about “Muslim bashing”.<\/p>\n There’s some Muslimah bitching about “Thinly Veiled Racism”<\/a>.<\/p>\n There’s Helen Lewis moaning that “No, feminists aren’t\u00a0scared to write about the Cologne attacks<\/a>” in which she defends feminism, not German women.<\/p>\n And so on.<\/p>\n Let’s see now… anyone remember how feminists reacted to Tim Hunt’s botched joke? \u00a0Not much holding back then, was there? \u00a0Or to Richard Dawkins and elevatorgate?<\/p>\n But mass sexual assault gets a pass. \u00a0No, worse, it gets\u00a0actively enabled<\/em>.<\/p>\n How can I say that? \u00a0Easily – remember Rotherham? \u00a0The reason that over\u00a0one thousand\u00a0<\/em>girls could be raped and exploited by vicious Muslims was that everyone in power was deathly afraid of being called racist. \u00a0By people like Ms Laurie here<\/a>. \u00a0Notice again that she’s more concerned about Islamophobia than about rape.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n So, feminists don’t say\u00a0squat<\/em> about the menace of Islam, even when it manifests in open rape and assault, and they attack people who\u00a0do\u00a0<\/em>speak up about rape and assault as bigots. \u00a0That’s called enabling.<\/p>\n Now at this point, I’m always bombarded with complaints by people saying they know a guy who knows a guy who knows a Tibetan yak herder who has \u00a0actually met a feminist speaking out about thi<\/em>s<\/em>.<\/p>\n Sure. \u00a0But, here’s the kicker, she’s not here in Europe, is she? \u00a0And in Europe, no feminist who thinks like that is in the news or on the soapbox, are they?<\/p>\n Lets be clear about what we’re talking about. \u00a0I am\u00a0not<\/em> talking about your acquaintance who refers to herself as a feminist who vaguely opposes the “pay gap” or whatever. \u00a0I am talking about the official voices of feminism, as seen in the media and academia, as seen above.<\/p>\n And again, I am referring to\u00a0Western<\/em> feminism. \u00a0For every group defined by some non-intellectual characteristic, the quality of its representatives is inversely proportional to how well that group does. \u00a0That’s why those women’s rights activists in the Islamic world are embodied by people like this:<\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n Whereas western feminists are represented by people like this:<\/p>\n (for those of you who don’t know, that’s the now infamous “Trigglypuff” protester).<\/p>\n I’m sure I’m going to get a lot of complaints about this, people who are upset that I’m generalizing about western feminists. \u00a0Well, I’m upset that we have mass sexual assault throughout Europe and feminists are dogpiling those trying to speak up about it.<\/p>\n I’m tired of pointing out that the utter gutlessness and uselessness of the liberal left has left the field wild open for far<\/a> nastier<\/a> forces<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n
![\"epa01255149](\"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/prussian\/files\/2016\/04\/Ayaan-2-263x300.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n![\"Sabatina](\"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/prussian\/files\/2016\/04\/220px-Sabatina_James-1-200x300.jpg\")
<\/a>![\"Yezidi](\"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/prussian\/files\/2016\/04\/2CA35B4300000578-0-Brave_The_three_women_fighting_unit_have_left_their_families_and-a-20_1442928751411-300x207.jpg\")
<\/a>![\"Trigglypuff\"](\"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/prussian\/files\/2016\/04\/takeyourhatespeechoutofthiscampus.gif\")
<\/a>