<\/p>\n
Remember last Christmas when a life-sized diorama depicting Jesus’ birth was basically dismantled when Damon Vix won 18 of the 21 slots? Well, the christians have hired an attorney and are asking a federal judge to “resurect the depiction of Jesus’ birth while the city aims to eject the case.”<\/p>\n
Missing from the courtroom drama will be Vix and his fellow atheists, who are not parties to the case. Their role outside court highlights a tactical shift as atheists evolve into a vocal minority eager to get their non-beliefs into the public square as never before.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
His action highlights an interesting trend in the battle to separate church and state:<\/p>\n
“In recent years, the tactic of many in the atheist community has been, if you can’t beat them, join them,” said Charles Haynes, a senior scholar at the First Amendment Center and director of the Newseum’s Religious Freedom Education Project in Washington. “If these church groups insist that these public spaces are going to be dominated by a Christian message, we’ll just get in the game — and that changes everything.”<\/p>\n
In the past, atheists primarily fought to uphold the separation of church and state through the courts. The change underscores the conviction held by many nonbelievers that their views are gaining a foothold, especially among young adults.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
These actions are not without controversy.<\/p>\n
Most of the signs were vandalized and in the ensuing uproar, the city effectively ended a tradition that began in 1953 and earned Santa Monica one of its nicknames, the City of the Christmas Story.<\/p>\n
The Santa Monica Nativity Scenes Committee argues in its lawsuit that atheists have the right to protest, but that freedom doesn’t trump the Christians’ right to free speech.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Vix is taking this whole situation in stride.<\/p>\n
For his part, Vix is surprised — and slightly amused — at the legal battle spawned by his solitary act but doesn’t plan anything further.<\/p>\n
“That was such a unique and blatant example of the violation of the First Amendment that I felt I had to act,” said the 44-year-old set builder. “If I had another goal, it would be to remove the ‘under God’ phrase from the Pledge of Allegiance — but that’s a little too big for me to take on for right now.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n