<\/p>\n
My husband’s ex-gay evangelist cousin has a prison ministry. We visited the prison once and wow… talk about surreal. These were totally “saved” individuals, so saved they generally looked upon me and my long-suffering husband with an almost snooty air. We weren’t dramatic, dancing worshippers like them, so I suppose we were of a lesser calibre of Christian.<\/p>\n
So, I read the following article with great interest.<\/p>\n
In 1996, noted criminologist Jewel asked a question<\/a> that has long haunted those hoodlums prone to pondering the existential consequences of their actions: \u201cWho will save your souls after those lies that you told, boy?\u201d For generations of American crooks, the answer has been \u201creligious do-gooders.\u201d As a 2006 Federal Bureau of Prisons report put it<\/a>, \u201cfaith groups have become involved in offering formal programs within prison to bring about not only the spiritual salvation of the inmates but their rehabilitation in the profane world as well.\u201d The idea is that spiritual rebirth may help tame the criminal impulse, and set wild hearts on the straight and narrow.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n
\nMaybe not. A new study in the academic journal Theoretical Criminology<\/em><\/a> (hat tip to the Vancouver Sun<\/em><\/a>) suggests that, far from causing offenders to repent of their sins, religious instruction might actually encourage<\/em> crime. The authors surveyed 48 \u201chardcore street offenders\u201d in and around Atlanta, in hopes of determining what effect, if any, religion has on their behavior. While the vast majority of those surveyed (45 out of 48 people) claimed to be religious, the authors found that the interviewees \u201cseemed to go out of their way to reconcile their belief in God with their serious predatory offending. They frequently employed elaborate and creative rationalizations in the process and actively exploit religious doctrine to justify their crimes.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n
Turns out many of the interviewees didn’t have a “vague notion” of the basic tenants of Christianity. Huh. They appear to be one of those “make it up as you go along” Christians.<\/p>\n
\nOften, the authors found, these knowledge gaps were self-serving. \u201cGod has to forgive everyone, even if they don\u2019t believe in him,\u201d insisted one 33-year-old enforcer for a drug gang, with a vested interest in avoiding damnation for the murders he had committed. A 23-year-old robber called Young Stunna suggested that the circumstances of his upbringing would absolve him of his crimes: \u201cJesus knows I ain\u2019t have no choice, you know? He know I got a decent heart. He know I\u2019m stuck in the hood and just doing what I gotta do to survive.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n
I once knew a couple who used their church as a tax shelter and justified it in the same way. They “donated” land to the church until they were ready to develop it. Then the church deeded it back to them. While waiting, they paid no taxes on it. They justified it by saying that the government didn’t need their money. Slick deal, eh?<\/p>\n
\nIndeed, many of those surveyed used their understandings of faith to justify their own criminal behavior. A 25-year-old drug dealer called Cool suggested that God doesn\u2019t mind when you do bad things to bad people:<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n
\n\nAlso another thing is this; if you doing some wrong to another bad person, like if I go rob a dope dealer or a molester or something, then it don\u2019t count against me because it\u2019s like I\u2019m giving punishment to them for Jesus. That\u2019s God\u2019s will. Oh you molested some kids? Well now I\u2019m [God] sending Cool over your house to get your ass.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n
\nIn the end, the authors found, \u201cthere is reason to believe that these rationalizations and justifications may play a criminogenic role in their decision making.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n
The authors admit to a small sample size in the study. They also didn’t study inmates in a large geographical setting.<\/p>\n
But the point is, neither is there conclusive evidence that religion on its own actually helps rehabilitate criminals. This becomes a policy question when we\u2019re talking about prisons. As that Bureau of Prisons report<\/a> put it, while \u201creligious programs in the correctional setting have been the single most common form of institutional programming for inmates,\u201d nobody really knows whether those programs are effective. There\u2019s not much good data. People tend to use tautological arguments to support religion-based rehabilitation programs. That\u2019s not good enough. If we\u2019re going to talk about whether religion helps rehabilitate criminals, we need to insist on data. Don\u2019t just take it on faith.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n