Here are all my posts on the fine-tuning argument:<\/p>\n
The Argument Stated<\/a><\/p>\n Is there only one possible universe?<\/a><\/p>\n Other Forms of Life?<\/a><\/p>\n Bad Methodology in the Fine-Tuning Argument<\/a><\/p>\n The Principle of Indifference<\/a><\/p>\n Does the Fine-tuning Argument Commit the Fallacy of Affirming the Consequent?<\/a><\/p>\n Elliot Sober’s Objection to the Fine-tuning Argument<\/a><\/p>\n Fine Tuning As An Argument for Prior Probability<\/a><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Here are some further resources on fine tuning:<\/p>\n Robin Collins’ homepage<\/a> (Collins is a leading expert and defender of the argument).<\/p>\n Victor Stenger’s homepage<\/a> (Stenger is a physicist and prominent critic of the Fine-Tuning Argument)<\/p>\n Ikeda and Jeffries, The Anthropic Principle Does Not Support Supernaturalism<\/a><\/p>\n Elliot Sober’s paper on Fine-Tuning<\/a><\/p>\n Luke Barnes’ posts on fine-tuning<\/a> – Luke Barnes is a physicist who gives a knowledgable and even handed treatment of the fine-tuning argument and its critics.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Books:<\/p>\n God and Design: The Teleological Argument and Modern Science<\/a><\/p>\n The Fallacy of Fine-Tuning<\/a><\/p>\n