{"id":260,"date":"2013-01-30T01:22:22","date_gmt":"2013-01-29T14:22:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/hellfireclub\/?p=260"},"modified":"2013-01-30T01:27:31","modified_gmt":"2013-01-29T14:27:31","slug":"first-bloke-in-joke-furor","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/hellfireclub\/2013\/01\/30\/first-bloke-in-joke-furor\/","title":{"rendered":"First bloke in joke furor"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Tim Mathieson, the partner, boyfriend, bloke &#8211; or whatever the appropriate term may be &#8211;\u00a0of Australia&#8217;s prime minister, Julia Gillard, got into trouble yesterday at a reception for the West Indian cricket team. Alas, Mr Mathieson made<a href=\"http:\/\/www.australiantimes.co.uk\/news\/in-australia\/first-bloke-tim-mathieson-makes-bad-taste-female-asian-doctor-joke.htm\"> an\u00a0&#8220;inappropriate&#8221; (what the hell does that mean?) joke<\/a> about prostate examinations.<\/p>\n<p>Mathieson apparently said: \u201cWe can get a blood test for (prostate cancer), but the digital examination is the only true way to get a correct reading on your prostate, so make sure you go and do that, and perhaps look for a small Asian female doctor is probably the best way.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ve seen the clip on television, and can testify that this does not do justice to the first bloke&#8217;s comic timing, which was actually quite good. It got a laugh, and seemed to me quite appropriate as a joke about male anxieties over rectal probing.<\/p>\n<p>So now the whole country is talking about whether Gillard looked embarrassed as her bloke was speaking (perhaps a little bit, but it&#8217;s hard to tell, and I love the way everyone is suddenly a goddamn\u00a0expert on the prime minister&#8217;s facial expressions and body language); whether the joke was somehow sexist or racist (is it saying something bad about women or Asians? or maybe about burly white male doctors with fat fingers? who knows?); whether the comments were a product of nerves (he didn&#8217;t sound especially nervous to me, but again who knows?); whether they were &#8220;tasteful&#8221; (whatever, exactly, <em>that<\/em> means); and so on, and so forth.<\/p>\n<p>Give me a break!<\/p>\n<p>As far as I&#8217;m concerned, the first bloke&#8217;s witticism\u00a0was perfectly legitimate, non-sexist, non-racist humour on a blokey subject, addressed specifically to blokes, by a bloke who, as well as being the country&#8217;s semi-official <em>first<\/em> bloke, is also a healthcare ambassador. I&#8217;m not even sure whether his advice is\u00a0good (a lot of doctors and\u00a0reports seem to be questioning the usefulness of prostate examinations, but who knows&#8230; and I damn sure don&#8217;t want to get into <em>that<\/em> (as it were)).<\/p>\n<p>What I mainly take from the episode is that we\u00a0have yet another example of how\u00a0we now live in a culture\u00a0where every even vaguely public sentence\u00a0is likely to be scrutinised for whatever it might contain that is, if you squint at it\u00a0hard enough,\u00a0offensive to someone. Ours is\u00a0becoming a surveillance culture\u00a0and a &#8220;calling out&#8221; culture (I hate that expression, &#8220;calling out&#8221;, so redolent of the censorious\u00a0pastor up in his pulpit, pointing his fat, white, male\u00a0index finger at hell-bound sinners in the congregation&#8230; publicly naming,\u00a0blaming, and shaming them).<\/p>\n<p>Enough with all this\u00a0moralism over trifles. This is exactly the sort of cultural development that we don&#8217;t need and should be resisting\u00a0every centimetre of the way. Enough with all the micro-surveillance, the pious expressions of offence, and the sanctimonious\u00a0critiques from self-important, self-righteous\u00a0windbags. Enough already!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Tim Mathieson, the partner, boyfriend, bloke &#8211; or whatever the appropriate term may be &#8211;\u00a0of Australia&#8217;s prime minister, Julia Gillard, got into trouble yesterday at a reception for the West Indian cricket team. Alas, Mr Mathieson made an\u00a0&#8220;inappropriate&#8221; (what the hell does that mean?) joke about prostate examinations. Mathieson apparently said: \u201cWe can get a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":37,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[30,19,37],"tags":[121,122,119,123,120],"class_list":["post-260","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-culture","category-debate","category-in-the-news","tag-culture-of-surveillance","tag-jokes","tag-julia-gillard","tag-moralism","tag-tim-mathieson"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/hellfireclub\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/260","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/hellfireclub\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/hellfireclub\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/hellfireclub\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/37"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/hellfireclub\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=260"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/hellfireclub\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/260\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/hellfireclub\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=260"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/hellfireclub\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=260"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/hellfireclub\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=260"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}