{"id":81,"date":"2017-02-15T09:55:49","date_gmt":"2017-02-15T09:55:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/flyingscotsman\/?p=81"},"modified":"2017-02-15T10:02:54","modified_gmt":"2017-02-15T10:02:54","slug":"identity-politics-thoughts-gad-saad-dave-rubin-sargon-akkad","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/flyingscotsman\/2017\/02\/15\/identity-politics-thoughts-gad-saad-dave-rubin-sargon-akkad\/","title":{"rendered":"Identity Politics: Some Thoughts on Gad Saad, Dave Rubin and Sargon of Akkad"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I\u2019ve been hoping aggrieved Lefties would take a day off from raising my ire. How can I be expected to virtue signal with an even hand when wounded millennials pop up on my Twitter feed every five minutes? The fruit of the Left seemingly caters to midgets, which makes it awfully difficult to pass up. At this point, one wonders whether it\u2019s a strategy to dodge charges of ableism. But I digress.<\/p>\n<p>Since these gentle folks aren\u2019t taking any vacation days, let\u2019s put them to one side and turn our attention closer to the centre. I\u2019ve previously written about the myopic liberal-conservative alliance borne out of opposition to the far Left, but the behaviour of certain \u201cmoderate\u201d figures increasingly strikes me as more than a little troubling. With that in mind, I\u2019m going to offer my thoughts on some of the more prominent people straddling the Left\/Right divide.<\/p>\n<p>Let\u2019s start with Gad Saad. Here we have a college professor who appears to have fallen in love with being a minor e-celebrity. More importantly, Gad seems to be on a personal journey toward the political fringe. Can he legitimately market himself as part of the centre when he enthusiastically supports Donald Trump, tries to shame ex-Muslims into putting themselves in danger, and parrots hypermasculine Alt-Right terms like \u201ccuck\u201d and \u201ccastrati\u201d without the merest hint of irony? Gad communicates like a man who needs to tuck his dick into his sock, yet looks like a hypogonadic gnome. If only\u00a0self-awareness was his biggest problem.<\/p>\n<p>Gad&#8217;s\u00a0attempts to shame a prominent ex-Muslim for her decision to remain anonymous is what I find most egregious. For those unaware, he\u00a0has something of a running feud with an ex-Muslim known as Eiynah (@NiceMangos), host of the <em>Polite Conversations<\/em> podcast. During an unhinged Twitter tirade, he repeatedly suggested that there is something cowardly about her anonymity. We\u2019re living in a world where ex-Muslims are brutally murdered for leaving the faith, yet this crusader for secularism is apparently eager to create more victims. There is nothing brave about putting oneself in harm\u2019s way for no reason. Ex-Muslims who already have their identities exposed are certainly brave, but that\u2019s quite different from\u00a0purposely inviting risk. Any reasonable person would class that as stupidity, not bravery. Gad is either oblivious to the distinction or loathes Eiynah so much that he has simply abandoned compassion and common sense out of spite.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"500\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">If you are going to hurl endless insults at people who risk everything to speak openly, don&#39;t be anonymous. You live in Canada &amp; are not<\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Gad Saad (@GadSaad) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/GadSaad\/status\/805117697486979073?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">December 3, 2016<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"500\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">.<a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/GadSaad?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">@GadSaad<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/NiceMangos?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">@NiceMangos<\/a> Do you think ex-Muslims are only at risk when they breach a certain threshold of Twitter followers, Gad?<\/p>\n<p>&mdash; James MacDonald (@JimMacDonaldMMA) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/JimMacDonaldMMA\/status\/805126094806454274?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">December 3, 2016<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/twitter.com\/21logician\/status\/804548735476858881<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/twitter.com\/21logician\/status\/804552337213816833<\/p>\n<p>My issues with Gad extend beyond his perspective on ex-Muslims and him looking like part of Snow White\u2019s inner circle, but I\u2019ll save further objections for another day. One theme you\u2019ll notice, though, is the subjects of this piece tend to focus almost exclusively on the excesses of the Left. This is a mistake I\u2019ve been eager to avoid, and I find it disingenuous when I see it from others.<\/p>\n<p>On that point, let\u2019s shift focus to Dave Rubin. Since leaving <em>The Young Turks<\/em> in 2015, Dave has built up a sizeable audience of anti-regressives with<em> The Rubin Report<\/em>. I even counted myself among them during his early shows. His content hasn\u2019t evolved over the past couple of years, though. Indeed, the show is almost identical from week to week, and I can only listen to someone drone\u00a0on about classical liberalism and the regressive left for so long.<\/p>\n<p>While it\u2019s true Dave interviews people from across the political spectrum, it\u2019s invariably to the same end: lamenting the decline of the Left. I can\u2019t read Dave\u2019s mind, but I get the awful impression he is terrified of losing his audience. Every show and every tweet appear designed to pander to anti-SJWs and avoid alienating far Right allies like Milo Yiannopoulos, Steven Crowder, and Mike Cernovich. Trump embarrasses himself daily, yet the most pointed criticism Rubin can offer is a <em>Star Wars<\/em> joke or a <em>Golden Girls<\/em> reference. But when some lunatic on the Left is apoplectic over a stray pronoun, you can bet it\u2019s time to roll up the sleeves and get serious.<\/p>\n<p>Dave has responded to this criticism by claiming he\u2019s on the Left and is merely trying to clean up his own side. Many seem to have accepted this explanation as though they are suddenly fans of the Chomsky rule. This reasoning is equally flawed when Western feminists ignore Islamic misogyny because they need to first dismantle patriarchy in their own culture. If you are concerned about misogyny, geography shouldn\u2019t prevent you from criticising the worst offenders. Likewise, if your focus is culture and politics, you cannot just ignore the Right because you are more concerned about the failings of your own side. \u00a0The very idea of \u201csides\u201d is a major part of the problem. The Left and Right aren\u2019t opposing sports teams. Interpreting the political spectrum in such terms is just another form of identity politics. To that point, let\u2019s move onto someone who fundamentally misunderstands identity politics and its causes.<\/p>\n<p>Carl Benjamin, better known as Sargon of Akkad, is a popular British YouTuber who spends the bulk of his time criticising the far Left. He\u2019s most effective when arguing unopposed\u2014not unlike Cenk Uygur of <em>The Young Turks.<\/em> This gives him the freedom to construct an army of straw men and burn them to the ground over the course of a 30-minute video. When faced with a live opponent, Sargon doesn\u2019t fare quite so well. For example, he somehow managed to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=eZEe4PSLCoY\">lose a debate<\/a> to third wave feminist Kristi Winters\u2014and it wasn\u2019t particularly close. If car crash content is your thing, you might also want to check out <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=CJqP9gEpJCs&amp;t=1092s\">his disastrous debate<\/a> with <em>The Majority Report\u2019s<\/em> Michael Brooks, where both men spent about 40 minutes trying, and failing, to define the regressive left.<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=JlBqt_Q089U<\/p>\n<p>When he isn\u2019t losing debates and cheerleading right-wing populism, Sargon can occasionally be found decrying collectivism as one of the world\u2019s great evils. He has <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=CJqP9gEpJCs&amp;t=1092s\">argued at length<\/a> that identity politics is rooted in collectivism. He does this by attacking its most extreme forms and ignoring almost everything else. It\u2019s worth noting here that Sargon supports all sorts of collectivist policies, such as socialised healthcare. He&#8217;s either\u00a0one of the most philosophically confused people I\u2019ve ever encountered, or he doesn\u2019t understand the subject. His initial diatribe on the topic begins with this gem:<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAll ideologies are either individualist or collectivist. These are mutually exclusive perspectives that have no overlap.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In that case, I can only assume Sargon views mixed economies as one of life\u2019s great mysteries. He must equally wonder why so many ardent individualists tend to be libertarians and not anarcho-capitalists\u2014which is actually a fair question in the right context. Spoiler alert. It isn\u2019t only possible for individualism and collectivism to overlap, it\u2019s probably the most common position you\u2019re likely to find in the developed world. You\u2019re unlikely to encounter many pure anarcho-capitalists or pure socialists. There are certainly wingnuts like Stefan Molyneux, but these people tend to be the fringiest of the fringe.<\/p>\n<p>Much like Gad, Sargon presents himself as an intellectual. The problem is much of the content he churns out meets the definition of anti-intellectualism. Consider his championing\u00a0of Brexit, for example. We&#8217;re talking about a movement animated by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.telegraph.co.uk\/news\/2016\/06\/10\/michael-goves-guide-to-britains-greatest-enemy-the-experts\/\">statements like<\/a>,\u00a0&#8220;I think people in this country\u00a0have had enough of experts.&#8221; Almost every qualified voice was critical of Brexit. This applies equally to Sargon&#8217;s endorsement of Trump. You don&#8217;t get to brand yourself as an intellectual while supporting a man who has\u00a0made a virtue of ignorance. You can offer me all sorts of reasons for supporting right-wing populism, and I might just buy some of them. What you don&#8217;t get to do is pretend you occupy the intellectual high ground.<\/p>\n<p>The Left has earned some sort of backlash, but a\u00a0sense of perspective is needed.\u00a0Whatever happened to calling out bad ideas wherever we find them? The prevailing view now seems to favour calling out bad ideas so long as they\u2019re coming from the opposing team. The individuals discussed here are by no means the only ones guilty of a lopsided approach to social and political discourse, but they are helping to create an atmosphere of pure tribalism. It should be obvious that combating identity politics with more identity politics is\u00a0counter-productive, but then I appear to be hanging off the middle of the horseshoe these days.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I\u2019ve been hoping aggrieved Lefties would take a day off from raising my ire. How can I be expected to&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":75,"featured_media":82,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,11,6,9,15,1],"tags":[24,23,25],"class_list":["post-81","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-featured","category-gender","category-secularism","category-skepticism","category-social-justice","category-uncategorized","tag-dave-rubin","tag-gad-saad","tag-sargon-of-akkad"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/flyingscotsman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/81","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/flyingscotsman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/flyingscotsman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/flyingscotsman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/75"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/flyingscotsman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=81"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/flyingscotsman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/81\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":83,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/flyingscotsman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/81\/revisions\/83"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/flyingscotsman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/82"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/flyingscotsman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=81"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/flyingscotsman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=81"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/flyingscotsman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=81"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}