{"id":927,"date":"2007-12-14T12:18:00","date_gmt":"2007-12-14T12:18:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/2007\/12\/14\/the-mcginnhonderich-spat\/"},"modified":"2007-12-14T12:18:00","modified_gmt":"2007-12-14T12:18:00","slug":"the-mcginnhonderich-spat","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/2007\/12\/14\/the-mcginnhonderich-spat\/","title":{"rendered":"The McGinn\/Honderich spat"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-family: times new roman\">Ted Honderich has developed a theory of consciousness which he calls r<\/span><span style=\"font-style: italic;font-family: times new roman\">adical externalism<\/span><span style=\"font-family: times new roman\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: times new roman\">Colin McGinn <\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.homepages.ucl.ac.uk\/~uctytho\/McGinnReview.html\">reviewed<\/a><span style=\"font-family: times new roman\"> Honderich&#8217;s book setting out the theory in <\/span><span style=\"font-style: italic;font-family: times new roman\">Philosophical Review<\/span><span style=\"font-family: times new roman\">. The review is pretty damning. Opening sentences:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-style: italic;font-family: times new roman;font-size:+1\">This book runs the full gamut from the mediocre to the ludicrous to the merely bad. It is painful to read, poorly thought out, and uninformed. It is also radically inconsistent. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: times new roman\">Honderich has replied, and McGinn has replied to the reply. McGinn says:<br \/><span style=\"font-style:italic\"><br \/>I was well aware that the final product would, however, rank as among the most scathing reviews of a philosophy book ever written; reasonably so, in my opinion.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>You can find all these pieces on Ted Honderich&#8217;s website <\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.homepages.ucl.ac.uk\/~uctytho\/\">here<\/a><span style=\"font-family: times new roman\">. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: times new roman\">I myself contributed to a volume of <\/span><span style=\"font-style: italic;font-family: times new roman\">Journal of Consciousness Studies <\/span><span style=\"font-family: times new roman\">dedicated to the theory. My piece is <\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/lawpapers.blogspot.com\/search\/label\/Honderich%20and%20the%20Curse%20of%20Epiphenomenalism\">here<\/a><span style=\"font-family: times new roman\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: times new roman\">I won&#8217;t comment on this spat other than to say that the position McGinn attributes to Honderich &#8211; that real physical objects appear within worlds of perceptual consciousness &#8211; is not, it turns out, Honderich&#8217;s view. McGinn says:<br \/><span style=\"font-style:italic\"><br \/>Consciousness is not the awareness of the room (Honderich can make no sense of such &#8220;ofness&#8221;); it simply is the room &#8212; that very spatial, physical object.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Funnily enough, I had interpreted Honderich the same way as McGinn, but then Honderich, in his earlier reply to me, makes it clear that this is not his view. He says about me:<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size:+1\"><br \/><span style=\"font-style: italic;font-family: times new roman\"> His supposition that a world of perceptual consciousness includes physical objects plays another role in the second last section of his paper. If there are physical objects in worlds of perceptual consciousness, these worlds can&#8217;t be subjective in the ways they were supposed to be. Indeed so, I reply. That is why there are not physical objects included in them.<\/p>\n<p><\/span><span style=\"font-family: times new roman\">If you want a quick intro to Honderich&#8217;s theory, the opening part of <a href=\"http:\/\/lawpapers.blogspot.com\/search\/label\/Honderich%20and%20the%20Curse%20of%20Epiphenomenalism\">my paper<\/a> is fairly succinct (though bear in mind my misunderstanding).<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-style: italic\"><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ted Honderich has developed a theory of consciousness which he calls radical externalism. Colin McGinn reviewed Honderich&#8217;s book setting out the theory in Philosophical Review. The review is pretty damning. Opening sentences: This book runs the full gamut from the mediocre to the ludicrous to the merely bad. It is painful to read, poorly thought [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":13,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[94],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-927","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-honderich"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/927","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/13"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=927"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/927\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=927"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=927"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=927"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}