{"id":90,"date":"2012-05-02T18:47:00","date_gmt":"2012-05-02T18:47:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/2012\/05\/02\/howthelightgetsin-2012\/"},"modified":"2012-05-02T18:47:00","modified_gmt":"2012-05-02T18:47:00","slug":"howthelightgetsin-2012","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/2012\/05\/02\/howthelightgetsin-2012\/","title":{"rendered":"Howthelightgetsin 2012"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" class=\"left\" height=\"400\" src=\"http:\/\/howthelightgetsin.org\/assets\/400x400.jpg\" width=\"400\" \/><i>\u00a0<\/i><br \/><i>The following is from <a href=\"http:\/\/www.spoonfed.co.uk\/spooners\/spoonfed-arts-team-8139\/the-limits-of-science-why-philosophy-still-matters-6781\/\">Spoonfed<\/a>, written by Hilary Lawson founder of Howthelightgetsin.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>In the closing pages of<i>\u00a0A Brief History of Time<\/i>, Stephen Hawking takes a sideswipe at contemporary philosophy, arguing that it has been reduced to an analysis of language. In\u00a0<i>The Grand Design<\/i>\u00a0he goes a step further. \u201cPhilosophy,\u201d he tells us, \u201cis dead\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>As a philosopher and founder of the world\u2019s largest philosophy and music festival, <i>\u00a0<\/i><i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.spoonfed.co.uk\/spooners\/spoonfed-festivals-3834\/howthelightgetsin-2489\/\" target=\"_blank\">HowTheLightGetsIn<\/a><\/i>,  I\u2019m not convinced by Hawking\u2019s vision. Excluding philosophy and any  other strategy one might employ to tackle life\u2019s big questions seems a  careless dismissal of forms of human enquiry.<\/p>\n<p>The reality is  that science has no monopoly on truth. Scientist and broadcaster  Baroness Greenfield has spoken of the \u201csmugness and complacency\u201d of  science and has called for a return to curiosity and open-mindedness. If  science gave up its metaphysical pretentions and stopped supposing that  it was uncovering the essential character of the world, it would be  stronger not weaker. It would be in a better position to entertain new  theories, which might enable more effective intervention in what we take  to be reality. Just as science demonstrated the limitations of the  church, so now we must come to terms with the limitations of science.<\/p>\n<p>The  relationship between data and knowledge is a complex one. It\u2019s  important to consider what human knowledge consists of, how is it  uncovered and whether data can be trusted. This is turn raises issues  about what remains unknown and where developments are likely to be  found, as well as the ethical implications of new scientific research.  To what extent, for example, can we trust research funded by commercial  organisations? What are moral issues accompany human genome mapping?  These are not questions that can be answered by science alone.<\/p>\n<p>In <i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.howthelightgetsin.org\/tickets\/#product-id-445\" target=\"_blank\">The Limits of Science<\/a><\/i>,\u00a0one of this year\u2019s debates held in association with Spoonfed,\u00a0controversial biologist and author of\u00a0<i>The Science Delusion<\/i>, Rupert Sheldrake and physician and historian of science James Le Fanu will debate the limits of knowledge with\u00a0<i>Think<\/i>\u00a0editor,  commentator and philosopher Stephen Law. They\u2019ll be asking whether  science can uncover the ultimate nature of the world, or whether there  are things it simply cannot fathom. <\/p>\n<p>The irony is that in  Hawking\u2019s \u2018science-trumps-all\u2019 world, philosophy has never been more  necessary. The old certainties that came from religion and science have  been shaken and their demise has left us confused and lost in our  postmodern world.\u00a0 And where can we look now but to philosophy to try  and make sense of the strange circumstances in which we find ourselves? <\/p>\n<p>For  centuries in the West we&#8217;ve looked forward to political, economic, and  ethical progress. We&#8217;ve seen ourselves as on the upward curve of  history.\u00a0 But the future looks uncertain, our values precarious. Do we  need a new notion of progress and if so what would it be?  HowTheLightGetsIn is really an opportunity to get philosophy out of the  academy and into people\u2019s lives.<\/p>\n<p><i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.howthelightgetsin.org\/tickets\/#product-id-445\" target=\"_blank\">The Limits of Science<\/a> is on Saturday 9th June 2012  at HowTheLightGetsIn<\/i><\/p>\n<p><i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.spoonfed.co.uk\/spooners\/spoonfed-festivals-3834\/howthelightgetsin-2489\/\" target=\"_blank\">HowTheLightGetsIn<\/a> runs from 31st May to 10th June  2012.<\/i><b><\/b><br \/><b><br \/><\/b><br \/><b>From <a href=\"http:\/\/www.spoonfed.co.uk\/spooners\/spoonfed-arts-team-8139\/the-limits-of-science-why-philosophy-still-matters-6781\/\">here<\/a>.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><i>I am also co-hosting a dinner&#8230;<\/i><\/p>\n<div>\n<div>Event [438]<\/div>\n<div><strong>Saturday 9 June 2012<\/strong><\/div>\n<div><strong>7:00pm<\/strong><\/div>\n<div><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><b>Philosophy Now Dinner<\/b><br \/>  <strong>Anja Steinbaer, Stephen Law, Rick Lewis.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p> <em>Philosophy Now<\/em> editors Rick Lewis and Anja Steinbaer and  philosopher Stephen Law consider questions of truth and ethics in  philosophy and literature.<br \/> <em><br \/><\/em><br \/> <em>Price includes dinner<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u00a0The following is from Spoonfed, written by Hilary Lawson founder of Howthelightgetsin. In the closing pages of\u00a0A Brief History of Time, Stephen Hawking takes a sideswipe at contemporary philosophy, arguing that it has been reduced to an analysis of language. In\u00a0The Grand Design\u00a0he goes a step further. \u201cPhilosophy,\u201d he tells us, \u201cis dead\u201d. As a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":13,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-90","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/13"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=90"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=90"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=90"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=90"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}