{"id":814,"date":"2008-08-01T10:40:00","date_gmt":"2008-08-01T10:40:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/2008\/08\/01\/logic-and-god-iv\/"},"modified":"2008-08-01T10:40:00","modified_gmt":"2008-08-01T10:40:00","slug":"logic-and-god-iv","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/2008\/08\/01\/logic-and-god-iv\/","title":{"rendered":"Logic and God (IV)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Addressing the question:<\/p>\n<p>(1) How is it even <span style=\"font-style: italic\">possible<\/span> for there to be objective laws of logic in the absence of the Christian God?<\/p>\n<p>I pointed out that atheists simply deny the existence of God &#8211; they are free to be idealists, substance dualists, Platonists, etc. There is no immediate problem for them accommodating  laws of logic.<\/p>\n<p>But Sye presses his challenge: what <span style=\"font-style: italic\">explains<\/span> and <span style=\"font-style: italic\">underpins<\/span> these laws, then, if not the Christian God?<\/p>\n<p>One possible answer: maybe nothing does. Maybe they just obtain, period.<\/p>\n<p>Or maybe they don&#8217;t <span style=\"font-style: italic\">need<\/span> underpinning, because the question &#8220;What makes them necessary?&#8221; is itself confused (I quite like this answer, actually).<\/p>\n<p>It won&#8217;t do to say, Sye: &#8220;But you are just <span style=\"font-style: italic\">claiming<\/span> that the laws of logic may just be true, period, not <span style=\"font-style: italic\">arguing<\/span> specifically that they <span style=\"font-style: italic\">are<\/span> just true, period&#8221; as you do.<\/p>\n<p>After all, it is you that&#8217;s insisting an atheist cannot accommodate objective laws of logic, not we who are insisting we can (some of us don&#8217;t, in fact). Hey, perhaps we can&#8217;t! I am here to be persuaded. But the onus is on <span style=\"font-style: italic\">you<\/span> to show we can&#8217;t. For it is you that&#8217;s claiming there can be no laws of logic without the Christian God.<\/p>\n<p>I have simply suggested that this <span style=\"font-style: italic\">may<\/span> be true &#8211; that there are objective laws of logic, period &#8211; you have not shown that it <span style=\"font-style: italic\">can&#8217;t<\/span> be true that the laws of logic just are true, period, i.e. are not <span style=\"font-style: italic\">made<\/span> true by some yet deeper fact.<\/p>\n<p>The onus is now on you to show that this <span style=\"font-style: italic\">can&#8217;t<\/span> be true. Perhaps you can, but I am interested to see how.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, at this point you&#8217;ll probably just switch to question (2): but how do you, Stephen,  <span style=\"font-style: italic\">justify<\/span> your use of the laws of logic? But that&#8217;s a different question. I am currently addressing  question (1). You have yet to show this particular suggestion re. question (1) won&#8217;t do.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, even if you <span style=\"font-style: italic\">could<\/span> show that this particular answer won&#8217;t do, that would not establish your claim that the laws of logic can&#8217;t exist without the Christian God.<\/p>\n<p>There are very many other atheist responses available, which you are also going to have to shoot down. One by one.<\/p>\n<p>And <span style=\"font-style: italic\">even then <\/span>you are not done &#8211; you are also going to have to deal with the serious problem that there are innumerable <span style=\"font-style: italic\">other<\/span> dieties who might account for the laws of logic, dieties that have the advantage that there&#8217;s not overwhelming evidence against their existence (as there is against your God: the problem of evil). Why not a god that is necessary, all-powerful, but morally neutral, say? Rule that god out, please.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Addressing the question: (1) How is it even possible for there to be objective laws of logic in the absence of the Christian God? I pointed out that atheists simply deny the existence of God &#8211; they are free to be idealists, substance dualists, Platonists, etc. There is no immediate problem for them accommodating laws [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":13,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[68],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-814","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sinner-ministries-proof-of-the-existence-of-god"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/814","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/13"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=814"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/814\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=814"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=814"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=814"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}