{"id":812,"date":"2008-08-01T23:37:00","date_gmt":"2008-08-01T23:37:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/2008\/08\/01\/syes-definition-of-proof\/"},"modified":"2008-08-01T23:37:00","modified_gmt":"2008-08-01T23:37:00","slug":"syes-definition-of-proof","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/2008\/08\/01\/syes-definition-of-proof\/","title":{"rendered":"Sye&#8217;s definition of &#8220;proof&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here&#8217;s a small but I think very telling observation worth making at this point. Sye has just defined a &#8220;proof&#8221; as <span style=\"font-style: italic\">a valid argument with true premises<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>This really does explain a lot.<\/p>\n<p>For that&#8217;s not what a &#8220;proof&#8221; is, in fact.<\/p>\n<p>Suppose I am trying to convince you that I have an offspring. You don&#8217;t believe me. As a matter of fact I do have an offspring. I now offer you this &#8220;proof&#8221; of that fact:<\/p>\n<p>   I have a daughter<br \/>   Therefore, I have an offspring<\/p>\n<p>This argument is valid. And its premise is true, too. But obviously I would not ordinarily be considered to have &#8220;proved&#8221; to you that I have an offspring &#8211; not in the sense of giving you good grounds to accept that conclusion, or in the sense of demonstrating to you, beyond reasonable doubt, the truth of my conclusion.<\/p>\n<p>Why not? well, in order to provide a genuine &#8220;proof&#8221;, I must not help myself to any unargued for and contentious premises, as I do in the above example. That is why it fails as a genuine proof. (In fact, the premise presupposes the truth of the conclusion.)<\/p>\n<p>Sye&#8217;s &#8220;proof&#8221; similarly contains an unargued for and contentious premise. So it&#8217;s not a genuine proof either. <span style=\"font-style: italic\">Whether or not its a valid argument with true premises.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Sye can call it a &#8220;proof&#8221; if he wants (he can just insist it is a valid argument with true premises). But only by using the word &#8220;proof&#8221; in his own very peculiar way &#8211; <span style=\"font-style: italic\">a way that prohibits him from then accusing anyone not convinced by his argument of any sort of illogicality or unreasonableness.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>I think this goes some way to explaining why Sye&#8217;s so convinced he has a proof, despite the fact that he very obviously doesn&#8217;t. He is confused about what a &#8220;proof&#8221; is. Is that fair comment, would you say, Sye?<\/p>\n<p>Sye &#8211; <span style=\"font-style: italic\">is it your view that if we find your argument unconvincing and so reject your conclusion, we are not guilty of  any sort of unreasonableness or illogicality<\/span>? Given your definition of &#8220;proof&#8221;, and given your argument does help itself to an unargued for and contentious premise, it looks like it has to be your view.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here&#8217;s a small but I think very telling observation worth making at this point. Sye has just defined a &#8220;proof&#8221; as a valid argument with true premises. This really does explain a lot. For that&#8217;s not what a &#8220;proof&#8221; is, in fact. Suppose I am trying to convince you that I have an offspring. You [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":13,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[68],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-812","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sinner-ministries-proof-of-the-existence-of-god"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/812","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/13"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=812"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/812\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=812"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=812"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=812"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}