{"id":811,"date":"2008-08-02T21:24:00","date_gmt":"2008-08-02T21:24:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/2008\/08\/02\/syes-but-you-dont-believe-that-move\/"},"modified":"2008-08-02T21:24:00","modified_gmt":"2008-08-02T21:24:00","slug":"syes-but-you-dont-believe-that-move","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/2008\/08\/02\/syes-but-you-dont-believe-that-move\/","title":{"rendered":"Sye&#8217;s &#8220;but you don&#8217;t believe that&#8221; move"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Sye, you have repeatedly made a certain sort of move. Here&#8217;s an example.<\/p>\n<p>I say, &#8220;Sye, not only have you not got a good argument for logic being underpinned by a deity, why your <span style=\"font-style: italic\">particular<\/span> deity &#8211; the Christian God &#8211; rather than another deity that I might find more plausible?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>You say &#8211; &#8220;But you don&#8217;t believe in any other Gods either, so why should we even consider them?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s why this doesn&#8217;t wash with me.<\/p>\n<p>You are not just arguing that a deity is required to underpin logic; you are arguing for a very specific deity &#8211; the Judeo-Christian God. Now, even if I could be persuaded that <span style=\"font-style: italic\">some<\/span> deity is required, your <span style=\"font-style: italic\">particular<\/span> deity would still, I think, be one of the least reasonable to invoke.<\/p>\n<p>So it&#8217;s entirely relevant for me to ask &#8211; even if you <span style=\"font-style: italic\">could<\/span> show a deity is required, why <span style=\"font-style: italic\">this<\/span> one?<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s an analogy. Five go on holiday on a deserted island. Bert, one of the five, dies apparently alone in a boating accident. Now I, as prosecutor, claim that this was no accident and Bill, one of the other four, murdered Bert.<\/p>\n<p>Trouble is, not only have I not yet produced any good evidence that Bert was murdered, Bill, unlike the others, has a particularly good alibi (being on the phone at the time of the death &#8211; the phone being miles from the death).<\/p>\n<p>Now, as Bill&#8217;s defence, you do not believe Bert was murdered. You start by pointing out there is, as yet, no evidence he was.<\/p>\n<p>And then you add, &#8220;But in any case, even if Bert <span style=\"font-style: italic\">was<\/span> murdered, why should we suppose <span style=\"font-style: italic\">Bill<\/span> is the guilty party? Where&#8217;s your evidence that it wasn&#8217;t one of the other three?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Would it be fair for me to respond, &#8220;But you don&#8217;t believe any of the others murdered Bert either, do you? Because you don&#8217;t think he was murdered. So you see &#8211;<span style=\"font-style: italic\"> we don&#8217;t even need to consider the others<\/span>!&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>This would be an entirely unfair move, would it not?<\/p>\n<p>If I, as prosecutor, want rightly to convince my audience that <span style=\"font-style: italic\">Bill<\/span> did it, I <span style=\"font-style: italic\">do<\/span> have to rule the other three out, <span style=\"font-style: italic\">whether my audience happens to believe any of the other three guilty or not.<\/span> If I now whipped out conclusive evidence Bert was indeed murdered, and then got Bill convicted by means of such logic, that would be a grave miscarriage of justice.<\/p>\n<p>My prosecutor&#8217;s move is just a rhetorical ploy, with no justification.<\/p>\n<p>Ditto your move, of course.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sye, you have repeatedly made a certain sort of move. Here&#8217;s an example. I say, &#8220;Sye, not only have you not got a good argument for logic being underpinned by a deity, why your particular deity &#8211; the Christian God &#8211; rather than another deity that I might find more plausible?&#8221; You say &#8211; &#8220;But [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":13,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[68],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-811","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sinner-ministries-proof-of-the-existence-of-god"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/811","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/13"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=811"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/811\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=811"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=811"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=811"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}