{"id":667,"date":"2009-02-01T11:37:00","date_gmt":"2009-02-01T11:37:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/2009\/02\/01\/syes-presuppositional-apologetics\/"},"modified":"2009-02-01T11:37:00","modified_gmt":"2009-02-01T11:37:00","slug":"syes-presuppositional-apologetics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/2009\/02\/01\/syes-presuppositional-apologetics\/","title":{"rendered":"Sye&#8217;s Presuppositional Apologetics"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I had a thought &#8211; not one that&#8217;s going to convince Sye, of course, but anyway, here it is, for discussion:<\/p>\n<p>Sye&#8217;s proof appears to be:<\/p>\n<p>1. Logic cannot exist without God<br \/>2. Logic exists<br \/>Conclusion: God exists<\/p>\n<p>This is a deductively valid argument (necessarily, if the premises are true, so is the conclusion).<\/p>\n<p>Of course, for a &#8220;proof&#8221; you need more than validity. So what else? Self-evident premises? Well, if so, then Sye will say: my premises are self-evident (and of course to him they seem to be). So it is a proof!<\/p>\n<p>Trouble is, what he is really supposed to be doing is proving to <span style=\"font-style: italic\">us<\/span> that God exists. Now you cannot prove something to an audience in this way if the premises are not self evident to your audience.<\/p>\n<p>Illustration: I can prove I just drew a three-sided figure:<\/p>\n<p>1. I just drew a triangle<br \/>2. Triangles are three sided figures<br \/>Conclusion: I just drew a three-sided figure<\/p>\n<p>Have I &#8220;proved&#8221; to you my conclusion? Of course not. You still have no idea whether I drew a three sided figure or not. It might be evident to me that the premises are true. But of course the first premise is not evident to you. So the &#8220;proof&#8221; fails.<\/p>\n<p>The same of course is true of Sye&#8217;s &#8220;proof&#8221; if it&#8217;s not self-evident to us that his premise is true. Which it is not.<\/p>\n<p>Now, this is where Sye gets ingenious &#8211; he says, in effect, &#8220;It IS self evident to you &#8211; God HAS given you this knowledge &#8211; but you choose to hide it from yourself, being miserable sinners. That means I HAVE proved it to you that God exists.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>This is a key move for Sye, then. He relies on saying that we are somehow deluded.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, <span style=\"font-style: italic\">someone<\/span> is deluded here about the self-evidence claim. The fact that even most Christians &#8211; many of whom I would guess are far more holy and virtuous than Sye &#8211;  scratch their heads and say &#8220;But it isn&#8217;t self-evident!&#8221; (I include here even those who think the premise is true &#8211; they don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s <span style=\"font-style: italic\">self-evident<\/span>!) should certainly suggest to Sye that he&#8217;s the deluded one.<\/p>\n<p>At the end of the day, all he&#8217;s got is an assertion &#8211; that we&#8217;re all (including the majority of Christians) deluded and that&#8217;s why we can&#8217;t see he&#8217;s got a proof.<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s the sort of thing nutters always say, of course!<\/p>\n<p>As I say, any fair-minded reader of the <a href=\"http:\/\/debunkingatheists.blogspot.com\/2009\/01\/defending-christian-faith.html\">posts over at Dan&#8217;s blog<\/a> surely won&#8217;t be able to avoid the conclusion that Sye is either a bit mental (religion can do that to you, of course, as I&#8217;m sure even Sye will recognise when it comes to certain other religious folk) or just a willful bullshitter.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I had a thought &#8211; not one that&#8217;s going to convince Sye, of course, but anyway, here it is, for discussion: Sye&#8217;s proof appears to be: 1. Logic cannot exist without God2. Logic existsConclusion: God exists This is a deductively valid argument (necessarily, if the premises are true, so is the conclusion). Of course, for [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":13,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[68],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-667","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sinner-ministries-proof-of-the-existence-of-god"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/667","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/13"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=667"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/667\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=667"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=667"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=667"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}