{"id":663,"date":"2009-02-06T08:55:00","date_gmt":"2009-02-06T08:55:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/2009\/02\/06\/the-appeal-to-mystery\/"},"modified":"2009-02-06T08:55:00","modified_gmt":"2009-02-06T08:55:00","slug":"the-appeal-to-mystery","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/2009\/02\/06\/the-appeal-to-mystery\/","title":{"rendered":"The Appeal to Mystery"},"content":{"rendered":"

There are more things in heaven and Earth than are dreamt of in your philosophy, Horatio.<\/span> Shakespeare\u2019s Hamlet.<\/p>\n

Oh dear – your cult\u2019s belief system is patently nutty. Not only do you have little in the way of argument for it, there also seems to be a great deal of evidence against it. If you want, nevertheless, to get lots of people to believe it, what do you do?<\/p>\n

Why not appeal to mystery<\/span>? By appealing to mystery, you can portray your critics as arrogant, unspiritual know-it-alls who think they have the answers to everything. You will appear humble and spiritual by acknowledging that, when it comes to the deepest questions, we must acknowledge our powers of reason have their limits. You can neutralize your opponent’s use reason, and make yourself look good and them look bad all, at the same time!<\/p>\n

There are several versions of this move, including:<\/p>\n

(i) \u201cWell, YOU explain it, then!\u201d<\/span> Find something that science and reason cannot explain or answer. Build an answer into your belief system. Then, whenever it\u2019s pointed out that you have no supporting argument, say, \u201cWell, YOU explain it.\u201d This puts your accuser on the defensive \u2013 they now have to do all the work. As they will fail to provide an explanation, your theory will appear to \u201cwin\u201d by default! (N.b. this is the fallacy known as \u2018argument from ignorance\u2019.)<\/p>\n

(ii) \u201cBeyond reason to decide.\u201d<\/span> When the Christian Stephen Green recently complained to the Advertizing Standards Authority about the atheist bus posters, the ASA said the adverts were allowed because the claims made (\u201cThere is a God\u201d and \u201cThere is no God\u201d) lay beyond the ability of reason to decide. The idea that religious claims are in principle beyond the ability of reason to decide is popular. So, as a cultist, try claiming there\u2019s a supernatural being X who created the universe, and then, when people say your belief system is irrational, point out that their rejection of your belief must be just as irrational<\/span>, because whether or X exists is something that it is in principle <\/span>beyond the ability of reason to decide<\/span>. So theirs is a faith position too! <\/span>Keep saying this over and over and there\u2019s a good chance no one will notice that actually such claims are not necessarily beyond reason to decide. Take the claim that the universe was made by a supremely powerful and evil being. This claim is straightforwardly falsified by observation \u2013 the world is just too nice a place for it to have been created by such a being. Even the religious will reject the claim as just obviously<\/span> false, given the evidence! Yet, when it\u2019s pointed out to them that there\u2019s way too much pain and suffering in the world for this to be the creation of an all-powerful all-good God (i.e. the exact same <\/span>type of objection), they typically say, \u201cAh, but this is something that\u2019s necessarily beyond the ability of reason to decide!\u201d<\/p>\n

These moves are designed to render religious beliefs immune to rational criticism<\/span>. But the truth is that, just as a detective who does not yet know who dunnit may still be able rationally to rule out certain suspects, so atheists unable to explain why the universe exists may still be able rationally to rule out certain answers. As even a religious person will typically admit there\u2019s overwhelming evidence the world was not created by an evil God, so they must also admit there could be overwhelming evidence it was not created by a good God either. But then it\u2019s<\/span> not<\/span> something it\u2019s necessarily beyond reason to decide.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

There are more things in heaven and Earth than are dreamt of in your philosophy, Horatio. Shakespeare\u2019s Hamlet. Oh dear – your cult\u2019s belief system is patently nutty. Not only do you have little in the way of argument for it, there also seems to be a great deal of evidence against it. If you […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":13,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[63],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-663","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-atheism-the-mystery-move"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/663","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/13"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=663"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/663\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=663"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=663"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=663"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}