{"id":376,"date":"2010-05-28T08:20:00","date_gmt":"2010-05-28T08:20:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/2010\/05\/28\/naturalism-conference\/"},"modified":"2010-05-28T08:20:00","modified_gmt":"2010-05-28T08:20:00","slug":"naturalism-conference","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/2010\/05\/28\/naturalism-conference\/","title":{"rendered":"Naturalism conference"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Centre for the Philosophy of Religion, Heythrop College, University of London<\/p>\n<p>Religion and Naturalism<\/p>\n<p>Saturday 12 June 2010<\/p>\n<p>The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy defines ontological naturalism as the assertion that reality has no place for supernatural or other \u2018spooky\u2019 kinds of entity.<\/p>\n<p>Much of current philosophy operates within a naturalist paradigm, and therefore starts from a position that seems inherently hostile to traditional religion. How should defenders of religion respond to the naturalist challenge? Is naturalism a coherent outlook, or is it an illegitimate attempt to extend the scope of science to the whole of reality? Is a theistic worldview \u2013 in its implications for ethics,for psychology, for cosmology \u2013 on a collision course with naturalism? The distinguished speakers at this one-day conference, organized by the Centre for the Philosophy of Religion at Heythrop College, University of London, will be debating an issue that has become central to contemporary philosophy of religion.<\/p>\n<p>CONFERENCE PROGRAMME<\/p>\n<p>To encourage a lively and productive debate, each session has one speaker who is broadly sympathetic to the naturalist outlook and one who favours a theistic position. In each ninety minute session each speaker will talk for thirty minutes and the discussion will then be opened to the floor for thirty minutes. To conclude the<br \/>conference, there will be a round table discussion involving all six speakers, with the opportunity for further comments and questions from the floor.<\/p>\n<p>10.00 am SESSION 1: Naturalism and Metaphysics<br \/>Paul Snowdon and Keith Ward<br \/>11.30 am COFFEE<br \/>12:00 noon SESSION 2: Naturalism and Mind<br \/>David Papineau and John Haldane<br \/>1.30 pm LUNCH<br \/>2:30 pm SESSION 3: Naturalism and Ethics<br \/>Simon Blackburn and Fiona Ellis<br \/>4:00 pm SESSION 4: Reflections and Conclusions<br \/>Round table discussion, introduced by John Cottingham<br \/>4: 45 pm TEA AND DISPERSAL<\/p>\n<p>EMAIL REGISTRATION WITH FEES ON DAY.<\/p>\n<p>To register please send your full name in an email to f.ellis@heythrop.ac.uk with 12 June as header,indicating your fees category (see below).<br \/>U of L faculty\/students \u2013 no charge<br \/>Students &#8211; \u00a35<br \/>Concession &#8211; \u00a310<br \/>Standard &#8211; \u00a320<br \/>HEYTHROP COLLEGE University of London<br \/>Kensington Square, London W8 5HN<br \/>Tel. 020 7795 6600 www.heythrop.ac.uk<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Centre for the Philosophy of Religion, Heythrop College, University of London Religion and Naturalism Saturday 12 June 2010 The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy defines ontological naturalism as the assertion that reality has no place for supernatural or other \u2018spooky\u2019 kinds of entity. Much of current philosophy operates within a naturalist paradigm, and therefore starts from [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":13,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-376","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-events"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/376","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/13"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=376"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/376\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=376"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=376"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/believingbullshit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=376"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}