{"id":2305,"date":"2017-06-22T16:30:42","date_gmt":"2017-06-22T21:30:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/avant-garde\/?p=2305"},"modified":"2017-06-22T16:30:56","modified_gmt":"2017-06-22T21:30:56","slug":"senate-democrats","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/avant-garde\/2017\/06\/senate-democrats\/","title":{"rendered":"Senate Democrats had no valid reason to ignore Islam reformers"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"font-family: Verdana,sans-serif;text-align: justify\"><a href=\"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/avant-garde\/2017\/06\/22\/senate-democrats\/\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/avant-garde\/files\/2017\/06\/Ayaan-Hirsi-Ali.jpg\" border=\"0\" \/><\/a>By now, you&#8217;ve probably heard about how the Senate Democrats in the US Senate basically ignored <strong>Ayaan Hirsi Ali<\/strong> and <strong>Asra Nomani<\/strong> during the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.hsgac.senate.gov\/hearings\/ideology-and-terror-understanding-the-tools-tactics-and-techniques-of-violent-extremism\">\u201c<em>Ideology and Terror: Understanding the Tools, Tactics, and Techniques of Violent Extremism<\/em>&#8221; hearing<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Surprisingly enough, the NYT allowed Hirsi Ali and Nomani to tell how <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2017\/06\/22\/opinion\/kamala-harris-islamism-senate-hearing.html\">three female Democrat senators ignored their account<\/a> of the dangers of giving Islam a free pass into politics (including how dangerous it is for women).<\/p>\n<p>So now, <strong>Hemant Mehta<\/strong> at <em>Friendly Atheist<\/em> decided <a href=\"http:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/friendlyatheist\/2017\/06\/22\/theres-a-reason-senate-democrats-didnt-ask-questions-of-two-muslim-reformers\/\">they did it with good reason<\/a> (!) and accounts for the motives of <strong>Kamala Harris<\/strong>, <strong>Maggie Hassan<\/strong> and <strong>Claire McCaskill<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Is there any defense for the Democrats\u2019 silence on the matter? Sure, and the women don\u2019t mention this at all in their article.<\/p>\n<p><strong>It\u2019s not that Harris and McCaskill and Hassan don\u2019t care about issues like honor killings and FGM<\/strong>. But this hearing was ostensibly a way for Republicans to boost support for their unconstitutional Muslim travel ban. The Democrats wanted no part in lending any credibility to it. <strong>Any hint that they agreed with Hirsi Ali and Nomani on the destruction political Islam can cause could theoretically be used to justify further encroachment on the civil rights of <em>all<\/em> Muslims<\/strong>. Hirsi Ali and Nomani were essentially being used by Republicans to justify policies that were far removed from fighting back against anti-women ideologies.<\/p>\n<p>That makes a lot of sense, <strong>even if the Democrats didn\u2019t say it out loud<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>[&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p>If and when Democrats ever regain power in the Senate, it would be wise for leaders like Harris and McCaskill to call for a real discussion on how religion hurts women and what policies can be implemented to minimize extremism.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>They&#8217;re <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/avant-garde\/2015\/07\/26\/dakwins-bashing-lauren-nelson\/\">reading minds again<\/a><\/strong> at <em>Friendly Atheist<\/em>, <em>huh<\/em>? It&#8217;s actually funny, because there&#8217;s no evidence whatsoever of anything Mehta is saying (he even drank the Regressive kool-aid that portrays Ayaan as right-wing!). The only links in his post are to Ayaan&#8217;s and Nomani&#8217;s words.<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s no evidence Harris, McCaskill and Hassan care about issues like honor killings and FGM. And <strong>what can be claimed without evidence can be dismissed without evidence<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>For the sake of the argument, let&#8217;s forget for a second that there&#8217;s nothing to back up what Mehta said and pretend it is actually true, and that Harris <em>et al<\/em> were trying to avoid giving ammo to the Republicans. Well, <strong>that&#8217;s a shitty argument!<\/strong> There&#8217;s not a single alternative that could do more to improve Muslims lives and civil-rights guarantees than challenging Islamism, for the majority of its victims <em>are<\/em> Muslims.<\/p>\n<p>So Mehta&#8217;s <del datetime=\"2017-06-22T20:13:43+00:00\">lie<\/del> claim is just a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.logicallyfallacious.com\/tools\/lp\/Bo\/LogicalFallacies\/94\/False-Dilemma\">false dilemma<\/a> \u2014and even if it turns out to be true, it was still the wrong call\u2014. You can oppose anti-Muslim bigotry and challenge political Islam at the very same time. They&#8217;re not mutually exclusive. And <strong>if the Senators are putting partisanship before the rights of half the population, then they have a serious priorities problem and I&#8217;m not sure they&#8217;re even fit to hold public office<\/strong>. I fail to see how what Mehta is claiming could be an acceptable excuse to any self-respecting human being.<\/p>\n<p>To sum up: <strong>Mehta failed epically to hold accountable three public servants who are hindering the efforts to fight Muslim terrorism, and made up a shitty excuse for their behavior<\/strong> (with no supporting evidence whatsoever), throwing two fellow secularists under the bus in the process.<\/p>\n<p>The <em>Friendly Atheist<\/em>: an atheist so friendly, he will make shit up to excuse elected senators when they choose to keep on giving religious privilege to the religion of special needs!<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Mehta failed epically to hold accountable three public servants who are hindering the efforts to fight Muslim terrorism, and made up a shitty excuse for their behavior (with no supporting evidence whatsoever), throwing two fellow secularists under the bus in the process<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":26,"featured_media":2307,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[91,9],"tags":[417,343,142,110,138,82],"class_list":["post-2305","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-atheism","category-secularism","tag-asra-nomani","tag-ayaan-hirsi-ali","tag-hemant-mehta","tag-islam","tag-religious-privilege","tag-us"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/avant-garde\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2305","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/avant-garde\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/avant-garde\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/avant-garde\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/26"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/avant-garde\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2305"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/avant-garde\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2305\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/avant-garde\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2307"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/avant-garde\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2305"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/avant-garde\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2305"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/avant-garde\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2305"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}