{"id":1172,"date":"2014-07-23T14:00:17","date_gmt":"2014-07-23T19:00:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/avant-garde\/?p=1172"},"modified":"2014-07-23T11:43:27","modified_gmt":"2014-07-23T16:43:27","slug":"deborah-orr-richard-dawkins","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/avant-garde\/2014\/07\/deborah-orr-richard-dawkins\/","title":{"rendered":"Deborah Orr bashes Dawkins, just because"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"font-family: Verdana,sans-serif;text-align: justify\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/25.media.tumblr.com\/c2ac656b6a193debc9086cc5df8fdbec\/tumblr_mt6sowd2Qf1qcnn8do1_500.jpg\" width=\"500\" height=\"260\" class=\"alignnone\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Hey, look, <strong>Richard Dawkins<\/strong> is being <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/commentisfree\/2014\/jun\/06\/richard-dawkins-lack-of-sympathy-for-religion-shame\" title=\"Richard Dawkins's lack of sympathy for those who cling to religion is a shame\">bashed again<\/a>; this time by <strong>Deborah Orr<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><!--more-->As Dawkins must know, the difference between fairy stories and religious belief is that <strong>there comes a time in a person&#8217;s life when societal consensus deems it no longer seemly to believe in the former<\/strong>. Likewise, no one would find it cute if they moved in with their boyfriend, only to find that come Christmas he was hanging out his stocking and leaving a glass of advocaat for Santa. There is no such consensus over belief in God, far from it. <strong>No British prime minister and no US president has thus far agreed with Dawkins that belief in God is silly and irrational<\/strong>.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Well, nor the irrationality of a claim neither it&#8217;s truthfulness stem from social consensus or the acceptance of any ruler. <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Argumentum_ad_populum\">Ad populum<\/a><\/em> and <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Argument_from_authority\">ad verecundiam<\/a><\/em> fallacies.<\/p>\n<p>A claim is irrational when it has no supporting evidence whatsoever (god and Santa being fine examples).<\/p>\n<p>Back to Orr, who kept on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/commentisfree\/2014\/jun\/06\/richard-dawkins-lack-of-sympathy-for-religion-shame\">bashing Dawkins<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>But <strong>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s quite time yet to berate believers as nothing but tiresome fools<\/strong>. Apart from anything else, there are still too many of them, and some of them are still too powerful. It&#8217;s easy to be brave when the consequence is a high public profile and continued book sales. Dawkins proselytises from a very safe place. <strong>A lot of people still live side by side with militant theists, and it makes them horribly vulnerable<\/strong>. That is no fairy story, made to be brushed aside. That is a fact of life on Earth.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I <strong>haven&#8217;t seen Dawkins berating believers<\/strong> as tiresome fools. I&#8217;ve seen him berate belivers&#8217; beliefs as follies&#8230; because they&#8217;re. People deserve respect, but their ideas don&#8217;t, <strong>beliefs are fair game<\/strong> \u2014 that&#8217;s how democracy and science progress: by questioning ruling ideas, testing them out against our accumulated knowledge and letting people know how that turned out.<\/p>\n<p>And yes, there are still too many believers and they&#8217;re too powerful, but <strong>were it not for Dawkins, there would be still more of them, and more powerful<\/strong>, and we wouldn&#8217;t have anyone as clear headed and with such a broad audience as Richard Dawkins to counter them.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m sorry miss Orr, but you can&#8217;t have it both ways: <strong>without Richard Dawkins powerful religionists would have it easier than they do<\/strong> and we atheists would have it a lot harder than we do, and many of us would be a lot more vulnerable, whether you like this fact or not.<\/p>\n<p>(hat tip to <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/florezjose\/status\/491952554658762752\">Jos\u00e9 Fernando Fl\u00f3rez<\/a><\/strong>)<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Hey, look, Richard Dawkins is being bashed again; this time by Deborah Orr:<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":26,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[91,196],"tags":[382,333,31,58],"class_list":["post-1172","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-atheism","category-philosophy","tag-atheism","tag-deborah-orr","tag-new-atheism","tag-richard-dawkins"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/avant-garde\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1172","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/avant-garde\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/avant-garde\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/avant-garde\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/26"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/avant-garde\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1172"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/avant-garde\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1172\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1180,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/avant-garde\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1172\/revisions\/1180"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/avant-garde\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1172"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/avant-garde\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1172"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skepticink.com\/avant-garde\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1172"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}